Approval of 3rd rehab center angers Clark County neighbors

Victor Padron stands in front of his home in Las Vegas, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. Padron is concerned about rehab centers that opened in his residential community on Bahama Bay Court. (Erik Verduzco / Las Vegas Review-Journal) Las Vegas, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. (Erik Verduzco / Las Vegas Review-Journal) Padron, right, with his neighbor Lori Niimi, talks about a rehab center that opened next door in his residential community on Bahama Bay Court in Las Vegas, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. (Erik Verduzco / Las Vegas Review-Journal) Niimi, left, with his wife Lori, at the home of their neighbor Victor Padron, talks about rehab centers that opened in their residential community on Bahama Bay Court in Las Vegas, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. (Erik Verduzco / Las Vegas Review-Journal) Niimi, from left, with his wife Lori, at the home of their neighbor Victor Padron, talk about a rehab centers that opened in their residential community on Bahama Bay Court in Las Vegas, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. (Erik Verduzco / Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Clark County resident Victor Padron has ed his county commissioner, his governor, his congresswoman and a senator with this question: Why has his Spring Valley neighborhood become a haven for residential rehab centers?

The gist of the response is that group homes — or “community residences,” to use the term in the county statutes — for people with addictions are protected under the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination in housing based on a disability, including addiction.

He’s also been told that the county government — not state or federal entities — regulates community residences.

But he still seeks a satisfactory response to another question: What recourse is available when the county has approved community residences that function as rehab centers, with operations neighbors contend are too intensive for a residential area?

After months of back and forth with county officials, Padron said, “They tell me I have an attitude, and they brush me off. I do have an attitude, because I’m sick of this. I live this 24 hours a day.”

By “this” he means additional traffic on his cul de sac of large homes, as well as concerns about safety, property values and changes to the neighborhood’s character.

Third center approved

Since early September, when , Clark County has approved a rehab center a few blocks from two others in the neighborhood near Twain Avenue and Fort Apache Road.

The county also cited a sober living home that was operating as a community residence in the neighborhood without county approval. That home has since closed its doors. Under county regulations, community residences cannot be closer than 660 feet from one another, as measured in walking distance. The sober living home was across the street from the new rehab center, Vogue Recovery Center, and under the distance requirements one of them had to go.

The newest county-approved community residence, on Dutch Valley Drive, describes itself on its website as a “drug and alcohol rehab facility.”

“Housed in a private, luxury community setting, Vogue Recovery Center provides serenity and healing in the sunny warmth of Las Vegas,” the website states.

The application to the county by Eden Treatment Center, which operates Vogue Recovery Center, requested approval “to house 10 adult women in a state-licensed therapeutic group home setting, utilizing the protections of the federal Fair Housing and Americans with Disabilities Acts.”

As with the other rehab centers, the county approved the request administratively without notifying neighbors, which a spokesman said the county is not required to do.

The county also has closed zoning complaints filed by neighbors about two rehab centers operated by Ignite Teen Treatment, one of which is next door to Padron’s home on Bahama Bay Court. The neighbors complained about the intensity of the operations and the nature of the services provided.

In its application to the county, Ignite requested “to house 10 adolescents in a state-licensed, therapeutic family/group-home setting.” It cited the Fair Housing Act and the ADA.

On its website, Ignite states, “Clients at the adolescent rehab program live onsite with the 24 hour support of our treatment team comprised of licensed therapists, psychiatrist, nurses, addiction specialists, experiential counselors, educators, counselors and mentors.”

Under county statutes, the definition of a “community residence” specifically excludes “facilities for the treatment of alcohol and drug abuse.”

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

But county spokesman Dan Kulin said, “The preclusion of treating alcohol and drug abuse relates to medical interaction and medical treatment for the condition. It in no way infers that addicts cannot live in a community residence or group housing as they are a protected class.”

An Ignite executive declined to answer a reporter’s question about whether the center was providing medical services on site. The executive said the centers had “adopted numerous policies aimed at addressing the concerns of its neighbors, including complete bans on tobacco, alcohol, loitering and any activities at a loud or excessive volume.”

Neighbors also said they have evidence the Ignite centers are providing outpatient treatment to clients.

But Kulin said the county investigated the neighbors’ complaints and “no proof of violations (was) found.”

County Commissioner Justin Jones, whose district includes the neighborhood, said, “It’s permissible under the Fair Housing Act to receive treatment in a community residence. It simply can’t be medical treatment.”

More than a decade ago, the county was sued under the Fair Housing Act when it denied two use permit applications for group homes that failed to meet what were then 1,500-foot separation requirements. The county entered a settlement agreement with the Nevada Fair Housing Center in 2008 and reduced the distance requirement between community residences to the current standard.

“The county’s hands are tied by the Fair Housing Act,” Jones said, adding that he supported the goals of the act while understanding the neighbors’ concerns. His office has reached out to Rep. Susie Lee’s office “to have some additional discussion on whether there’s a need for changes to the Fair Housing Act.”

Federal involvement

Padron said the neighbors found a receptive ear in Lee’s office after staffers for other politicians at the federal and state levels told them their complaints were a matter for the county.

“The congresswoman’s office has been in touch with the relevant parties about this issue,” said Jesús Espinoza, Lee’s communications director. “Our top priority is to listen to constituents and determine how we can help. As with any casework that comes through our office, we’re hoping that a positive resolution can be found soon.”

Lee’s office facilitated a meeting between residents and representatives of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

“We are looking to engage with the (center) owners directly and doing everything that we can to foster this sort of dialogue with them because this really is a quality-of-life issue between neighbors,” said Ed Cabrera, regional public affairs officer for HUD.

“HUD really has a role to play when it comes to enforcing the Fair Housing Act, but outside of that, we leave it to our state and local partners to determine how they want their communities to look,” he said. “Absent any open fair housing complaint, I think the opportunity to affect change here really lies with the local process.”

Local regulators can address issues related to parking and traffic in the neighborhood, which county officials say they’ve been doing. But concerns regarding safety should be based on evidence and not on “stereotypes and prejudices,” Cabrera said.

“What’s vital for neighbors in the community to understand is that folks in recovery have a disability,” he said.

Jones said he was not aware of any other concerns about community residences in any other neighborhood in his district or in any other parts of the city. He said he didn’t know why rehab center operators have been drawn to this Spring Valley neighborhood, though residents surmise it has something to do with the size of their seven-bedroom homes, which are priced relatively low for their square footage.

Padron has filed a complaint against Jones with the Nevada Commission on Ethics, noting that the centers were approved administratively without notification to neighbors.

“I don’t believe my office has done anything to violate any ethics laws,” Jones responded. “We’ve been as responsive as is possible. We as the county will continue to address the concerns as best as we can under the law.”

In the last paragraph of his complaint to the ethics commission, Padron wrote, “The Federal Fair Housing Act was created to put an end to discriminatory real estate practices. It is an egregious misuse of this law to use it to open a business in a residential neighborhood.”

Mary Hynes at or. Follow on Twitter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*